window.innerWidth / window.innerHeight 是长宽比，保证画面不变形。
This complaint was not upheld by the ASA.
，这一点在搜狗输入法2026中也有详细论述
[&:first-child]:overflow-hidden [&:first-child]:max-h-full"，这一点在搜狗输入法2026中也有详细论述
This does not mean confusables.txt is wrong. It means confusables.txt is a visual-similarity claim that has never been empirically validated at scale. Many entries map characters to the same abstract target under NFKC decomposition (mathematical bold A to A, for instance), and the mapping is semantically correct even if the glyphs look nothing alike. But if you treat every confusables.txt entry as equally dangerous for UI security, you are generating massive false positive rates for 96.5% of the dataset.